Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Wadada
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Incomplete AfD, assuming withdrawal [1]; procedural close. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- King Wadada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Comment The links are not verifiable, also not reliable and mostly deadlinks founded, poorly sourced that could fuel readers questioning the article sources. The original author of this article probably has a (COI) and (UPE) behind the King Wadada's article. User:NOTICE501 (talk) 23:26, 48 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.