Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Amato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Amato[edit]

Non-notable actress, has been in a few independent movies and that seems to be all AW (talk) 22:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep google pulls up a handful of interviews that seem to be based around her newest movie: [1] [2] and a little chatter about that movie. I'd say borderline notable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 23:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I saw those too, but just because somebody is interviewed on some website, it doesn't mean they're notable. I haven't seen any mainstream media or anything. --AW (talk) 19:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note both this and Under the Raven's Wing, her movie, were created by the same person, who has no other edits. --AW (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very, Very Weak keep Found a few bits about her on the web that indicate some notability (albeit minor) within the profession. Borderline, but... New Kind Of Grey (talk) 17:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 02:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weakest of weak keeps. There's a few bits and bobs about her in this local news article, but ultimately it's about the film rather than her. PC78 (talk) 02:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. If I was to vote first I'd go for a delete but looking at all the refrences and comments above - Ill stick to the pack. Weak Keep. Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 02:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.