Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Webster
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kim Webster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It does pain me to bring this West Wing-related article here, but I'm not seeing much solid evidence of a GNG pass. She had a minor role in the show, and it doesn't look like she garnered too much coverage of her own through it, or another noteworthy role. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, had a minor recurring role in West Wing. Her subsequent production career, serving as a field producer in a few TV shows, has garnered even less coverage. Does not have SIGCOV. Pikavoom Talk 07:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, inclined to agree that this individual has not gained notability and does not appear to be significantly covered in any sense. The name itself isn't uncommon but even trying to narrow down searches is returning very little. Maybe the fact the article is barely developed in 18 years is an indicator. Bungle (talk • contribs) 07:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not even close to being notable as an actress, even less so as a producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not notable for Wikipedia Kpddg (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails notability. Gabe114 (talk) 14:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.