Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Tar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, few Google hits- the first one was the article itself. Nwwaew(My talk page) 23:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - [1] 4 million is "few Google hits"? I found a few that would work as references. This article needs sourcing, not deleting. - Lex 03:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment since Kim is a common name and surname, and Tar is a common word, you need to use both together in quotes to make the google search more accurate. That leaves only 586 links. But I'm not concerned about the quantity, but the quality of the links. Can you point out these sources so we can put them into the article? ColourBurst 20:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Yomanganitalk 17:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication of passing the notability criteria of WP:CORP. It would've been nice if Lex would have given a couple of examples of what he thought were good references. I don't see any among the ghits, or in Lexis-Nexis. Pan Dan 18:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Likely lovely places to eat, but not exactly Sardi's in terms of notability. Robertissimo 06:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.