Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Seung-hun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Seung-hun[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria showing lack of significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that is independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from YG Entertainment, CIX, and Stray Kids's related reportings. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 08:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Television, and South Korea. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, rather than restore the redirect. This is a textbook case of WP:Redirects are expensive. New account User:Leklu was created 8 March. Yesterday they made a dozen precocious edits for autoconfirm, then inexplicably moved this article to draft and blanked it, and blanked the redirect to draft. Then they immediately tried to recreate the article as Kim Seunghun: this was speedy deleted db-A10, and this article was moved back to main space. Deletion at AFD is the right remedy for this sort of game-playing, though no prejudice against recreation in a few years if his film career really takes off per WP:NACTOR. Wikishovel (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say the Leklu user is doing this out of any ill will, seeing from their actions. I'd assume it was more from lack of knowledge of how Wikipedia works. You and Leklu seemed to have talked it out yesterday, and plus I don't think the previous edits were "precocious" (they were adding an upcoming TV show to the pages of various actors - granted, it was the same show across all of them, but it was needed info anyhow). Plus, they didn't even create the page - they only added a filmography and tried to move it. Granted, based on the things they did regarding Seunghun's page I'd bet they're not very familiar with Wikipedia's processes (e.g. the moving guidelines and such).

Not commenting on whether the subject of the article is notable or not - I haven't checked out the sources, but I'd bet he's not notable anyhow. Wuju Daisuki (talk) 21:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No sign of individual notability. One acting spot does not have significant coverage. Evaders99 (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.