Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Bauer (radio host)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 14:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kim Bauer (radio host) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence is presented that this local radio host is notable. Grahame (talk) 08:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete- Although the article is reasonably well-written and sourced, it seems that the subject herself wrote it. No real assertion of notability either.
- Cheers mate!
- Λuα (Operibus anteire) 08:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This looks like a pretty obvious COI, and does not establish notability. RedThunder 13:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on WP:N grounds. NB: The potential COI is not in itself grounds for deletion.--S Marshall (talk) 23:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article fails to establish notability in accordance with WP:BIO. Article comprises trivia without citation, references or sources. Article appears to be advertising. Dolphin51 (talk) 03:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the COI obviously doesn't help, but obviously not meeting the WP:BIO notability criteria is what will do this in. I guess Wikipedia will just have to go without knowing whatever zany antics after drinking purified urine that they come up with next. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete: The article has been up there for a long time (2006). However, I don't think being a regional radio host is in itself notability enough for a Wikipedia article. Beyond that, there's nothing in the article but trivia. Notability not established. No reliable references provided.--Lester 06:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.