Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilrathi Heavy Destroyer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Keilana(recall) 22:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kilrathi Heavy Destroyer[edit]
- Kilrathi Heavy Destroyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable fictional spacecraft. The article has no reliable secondary sources to establish notability in the real world and fails Wikipedia:Notability. Article consists of a list of statistics, as one would find in a game guide and plot repetition. Wikipedia is not a game guide and should not have extensive plot summaries without real-world information. Pagrashtak 19:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Pagrashtak 19:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- along with just about everything in Category:Wing Commander spacecraft. --EEMIV (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fictional spacecraft need something special to them for an article. User:Krator (t c) 19:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to a List of X article as per current policy for minor fictional things such as this. Jtrainor (talk) 05:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as EEMIV says, the entire catagory should be vanquished RogueNinjatalk 09:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all articles in Category:Wing Commander spacecraft to create List of Wing Commander spacecraft. -Sean Curtin (talk) 07:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment Should this succeed, I will copy the names of all the spacecraft into a new article, and bundle-AFD the entire category. RogueNinjatalk 20:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.