Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiln (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn. Sourcing is sufficient for my opinion of notability. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm _Bacon 02:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kiln (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable ambient band. This has been in CAT:NN since 2010. I guess this could technically pass WP:NBAND #5 if Ghostly International counts as "one of the more important indie labels", but passing one NBAND criteria is only an indication that a subject may be notable. Well, anyway, I'm not finding substantial coverage in reliable sources that would pas WP:GNG, although there is a lot of search engine noise. Hog Farm _Bacon 00:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 00:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 00:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 00:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak keep~~ as they do have a staff written AllMusic bio here, and three staff written album reviews. Will look for more sources tomorrow, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find much more so sticking with weak keep, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are Entertainment Weekly, Pitchfork, OC Weekly reviews for Dusker. An Exclaim! review for another album... Caro7200 (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As well as the Allmusic coverage I found a few more sources - Slug, Exclaim!, Pitchfork, XLR8R, and ALARM. --Michig (talk) 09:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep moving to full keep from weak keep in view of the extra reliable sources coverage identified above so that WP:GNG is passed in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.