Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilmurry Ibrickane (Roman Catholic parish)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Kilmurry Ibrickane. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:28, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kilmurry Ibrickane (Roman Catholic parish)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The content has been copied to the article Kilmurry Ibrickane (Civil parish). It is not worth having two articles that cover the same material. Laurel Lodged (talk) 22:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You mean you have copied the info into a newer article, bringing the information about a Roman Catholic parish into that of a civil parish, including the local priests. This "merger" is in fact vandalism. The article about the Roman Catholic parish is the oldest of the two (originally created in 2012) while Kilmurry Ibrickane (Civil parish) a recent (March 2014) creation is. The Banner talk 22:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The merger was well signalled. It was also implicitly authorised by the consensus on WikiProject Ireland. THe Banner refused to accept this consensus. For his pains, he received a temporary ban. He is now back to old ways. The Project may consider taking more discplinary action against him. Laurel Lodged (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Kilmurry Ibrickane along with civil parish.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect article to Kilmurry Ibrickane - One article to deal with both these types of parishes suffices considering the scant information given on both. I've reworded the first sentence of the lede to give both equal status. Mabuska ^(talk) 21:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Per Mabuska's argument above. Finnegas (talk) 21:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. That is the sensible and obvious solution. There is only one parish, both civil and Catholic. Two articles on the same tiny rural area is an invitation to forking. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.