Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill Bill Chronology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 04:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kill Bill Chronology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR of something already discussed elsewhere Ironholds (talk) 16:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Original poster posted this support for the page on talk page "I suggest leaving this article up for a few weeks to see if it gets better. There is currently an edit war on the main Kill Bill article involving a chronology issue, and it would be better to deflect some of that over here." Well, it's been several weeks and the page has not gotten better. Removing content from the eyes of editors on the appropriate page seems a poor reason for creating a page. And the fact that there are edit wars over chronology issues suggests strongly that this is not material explicitly stated in the film, supporting the idea that this is WP:OR --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Really overly detailed, as well as unsourced, original research. Belongs on a fan website not an encyclopedia. Borock (talk) 17:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Definitely looks like WP:OR to me -- I strongly doubt it's possible to find verifiable sources saying that this is accurate. — GorillaWarfare ^{talk-review me!} 18:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A section could be written at Kill Bill about the narrative structure of the two films, similar to what's at Pulp Fiction (film); a stand-alone article about this is unnecessary. Cliff smith ^talk 22:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.