Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiera Wilmot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:22, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kiera Wilmot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May be WP:TOOSOON. WP:NOTNEWS, concerned about BLP issues, and if and how information on her future life can be covered. Barney the barney barney (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if ever there were a case of WP:BLP1E this would be it. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[Following is retracted] Keep: In my view, it is definitely news, since all the media are still talking about it nearly a month later... As for whether it is too soon: these court cases last for years. The original incident is closed and finished (so not too soon for a wikipedia article). Info on her future life is unlikely to become available before a considerable amount of time has elapsed.Michaelmke (talk) 12:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael, you should read the guidelines mentioned above, particularly WP:NOTNEWS, which states that Wikipedia is not a newspaper. PK T(alk) 12:31, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PKT, I have read it. Which part do you think it contradicts? I see a potential issue with point 3 of the policy (though it seems to me the person has become notable), but other than that, I don't see... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelmke (talk • contribs) 12:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, falls under WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. PK T(alk) 12:31, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PKT, I see your point about WP:BLP1E. Perhaps the article should not be about the individual herself.Michaelmke (talk) 12:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Classic example of BLP-1E. Carrite (talk) 17:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete As a bio, this article fails on BLP-1E. The phenomenon of scientific experimentation and freedom of intellectual investigation is important, but that is not what this specific article is about. Such an article would not focus entirely on one person but on the phenomenon. Crtew (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.