Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidwan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kidwan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kidwan city does not have any claim to notability. A Google search turns up disappointing results. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 18:30, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As long as Wikipedia remains a gazetteer, all cities, villages and towns, as long as it can be verified that they exist, are notable. Please also see WP:OUTCOMES. Silver seren^C 23:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cities whose existence can be established through one or more reliable source(s) are considered to be notable per se. Peter Karlsen (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, village whose existence can be verified from reliable sources. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.