Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kickoff Goal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kickoff Goal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No references. Barely and Google hits. Doesn't seem to be notable. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wow. I'm too nice to call it VG cruft. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 19:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sounds like a vanity article or something made up at home one day if you ask me. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 22:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no references. no notability. --T-rex 22:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable apparent OR/How to with no reliable third party sourcing. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with fire. No evidence of notability, an online search reveals no references, seems as if it fails WP:NFT, WP:OR, and WP:NOT#GUIDE. --Craw-daddy | T | 16:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.