Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kian Breckin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. No coverage provided to indicate Brecklin is notable now, but there is a path wherein he could be, rendering this helpful. Star Mississippi 21:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kian Breckin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Article was deprodded with the reason being "deprod, coverage looks signiticant". The only independent sourcing is routine contract coverage from the Yorkshire Post and Manchester Evening News. I couldn't find any sigcov of him. Dougal18 (talk) 14:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, coverage on the page already looks significant IMO.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draft If he makes his league debut, I'd say put back. But really, it's no where near enough coverage at the moment, and certainly the wrong side of WP:BASIC. Govvy (talk) 17:58, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with no prejudice against recreation. I agree with Govvy above that there's a good chance this individual will become notable, perhaps even in the near future. But as of this moment, the availabe sources fail to establish notability under WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Ortizesp. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 07:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Actualcpscm. Notability for WP:GNG doesn't seem to be there right now. GuardianH (talk) 16:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, if this is an example of TOOSOON, would draftifying be appropriate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn‘t be opposed to draftifying. Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 19:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Player has now made his debut in the Football League, so would class as notable.Footballgy (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Footballgy Under what guideline does this mean they are notable? Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 14:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.