Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khwaja Wajhullah Shah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Khwaja Wajhullah Shah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG ●Mehran ^Debate● 07:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the page Khwaja Wajhullah Shah is being marked for Deletion. I recommend that the page not be deleted, as lakhs of followers of this great sufi saint are waiting to contribute to add information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhshaik (talk • contribs) 10:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - to my great surprise I achieved a Googlewhack when searching for 'sufi saint Hazrat Shaikh Khwaja Wajhullah Shah Chisti-Qadri wal Arbaiin' - the WP article itself. I strongly suspect this is a spelling issue as sufi saints are generally well described so sources should be plentiful. Urdu help, anybody? Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment - google 'Khwaja Wajhullah Shah' as the remaining part 'Chisti-Qadri wal Arbaiin' are the sufi orders and the title of the saint. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhshaik (talk • contribs) 11:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did, and there's nothing notable, just 2 results. If that's all then we must Delete, which is why I ask if there are Urdu or other language sources, or other spellings of the name? Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:40, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gong show 06:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - notability not established. No reliable sources in over 2 week period this article has existed.--Staberinde (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 22:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.