Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khorshed Alam Sujon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mayor of Chittagong as an alternative to deletion. (non-admin closure) Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 05:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khorshed Alam Sujon[edit]

Khorshed Alam Sujon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Administrator, local politicians. When last Mayor of Chittagon A J M Nasir Uddin left his office, this person has been in charge until a new mayor was elected, something like Caretaker government. However i don't think this person is notable same as Caretaker government of a country. Also, this person was unelected. Apart from some press release, doesn’t received significant press coverage. fails WP:POLITICIAN. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Mayor of Chittagong as a plausible search term, and there develop from scratch a paragraph about him and his interregnum. The WP:CITEKILL obscures the fact that nearly all of the cited sources contain a single sentence about him, basically "Sujon has been appointed administrator of Chittagong City Corporation." WP:GNG says, "It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works." We can't assume that multiple sources containing significant coverage will materialize about an administrator keeping the seat warm. If more is written about him in reliable sources, the redirect can be expanded, but right now he isn't notable.
I don't recommend merging because most of the article was a copyright violation, and many of the inline citations fail verification. In the spirit of WP:TNT, redirect to fresh text. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.