Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khoosab Anjarak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:GEOLAND (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Khoosab Anjarak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability or claim of significance. MopSeeker Fox Three! 02:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a village it's guaranteed automatic notability, but I'll let the next admin close this, so you can hear it from two different ones. See WP:GEOLAND. Drmies (talk) 02:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Drmies is correct. As per WP:GEOLAND and WP:5PILLARS, all population centers are notable. And what's with this AfDing six minutes after article creation? [1] --Oakshade (talk) 05:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- For someone who seeks the mop, this is indeed food for thought, Oakshade--thanks. Drmies (talk) 14:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOLAND. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a settlement ergo it's notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep very clearly meets notability standards.Brustopher (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Villages are automatically notable. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.