Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khawla Chemakh
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Khawla Chemakh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor etc. Sources do not meet WP:GNG, and a search finds nothing better. Career achievements don't come even close to satisfying WP:NACTOR. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Tunisia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - As nominator says, nothing approaches the multiple major roles for acting notability. There is nothing in the article about the third-party coverage that would be required for general notability.
- Originator is a single-purpose account who created this article in draft space and then moved it to article space after being autoconfirmed. Article was draftified, and was then declined by two reviewers, and then moved back to article space by originator, and nominated for deletion. May be promotional editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Article fails WP:NACTOR by simple virtue of the fact that the roles she was in were not from notable films/television. I did search for a few of the productions to see if maybe some of them were notable but I really couldn't find anything The article also fails WP:GNG because while there are 17 references in the article, nearly all of them are non-independent sources. The ones that do appear to be independent sources such as this are nothing more than very trivial mentions. - Aoidh (talk) 22:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.