Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khatabook (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I feel the presentation of sources was sufficiently refuted by those advocating delete, and their refutations were not responded to, so I must accept them as being correct. On that basis, consensus exists to delete. Daniel (talk) 06:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khatabook

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG, News are only about funding, investment & announements. Lordofhunter (talk) 10:21, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India. Lordofhunter (talk) 10:21, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The nom states that "News are only about funding, investment & announements." These areas still have significant coverage, and it is not the case that WP:ORG is failed. The ⬡ Bestagon^[t][c] 12:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:59, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails NCORP. RPSkokie (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*In a prior afd, references were not significant; but, in this article, the news coverage appears to be passing WP:RS. Although few are press announcements, I tend to lean toward soft Keep. Tictictoc (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC) striking confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ––FormalDude (talk) 12:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep [1][2][3][4] are all independent, reliable, and significant sources about khatabook. This is enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Carpimaps (talk) 14:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Response Businessinder News, Livemint etc, all are based on funding, investors. None of them is helping to establish notability. Lordofhunter (talk) 06:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a company/organization therefore WP:NCORP guidelines apply. We need at least two deep or significant sources containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.

None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability of the company, based as they are on announcements and/or information provided by the company/executives with no "Independent Content". Perhaps The Bestagon and Carpimaps can link to specific sources (and paragraph numbers) that meet NCORP (not just GNG) and which contain in-depth and significant "Independent Content" that meets NCORP as I am unable to locate any sources that are sufficient. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per HighKing. Subject fails NCORP. ––FormalDude (talk) 05:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.