Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaled Yassin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Khaled Yassin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam article created by an account that is identified as the subject's PR, edited primarily by SPAs, and almost entirely self-sourced. Guy (Help!) 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably delete. Clicked the links on half-a-dozen or so of his books; they all came up with this notice [1]. I Note that it is inconceivable that a man could have written 25 books on titles ranging from Management of Child Health Programs in Developing Countries to Master of Science in Epidemiology and Biostatistics.' I might guess that they are paper topics, except that there are lot of papers listed, too. Many of the papers are mere titles (no link, no Journal name given.) Others look real; the ones I checked had very few citations, but it is routine for a public health researcher to publish a lot without being notable. Noting that "Khaled Yassin" is quite a common name.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete took a closer look at this self-sourced piece of self-PROMO, and I can see no indication of notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 06:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this promotional text per nomination. Wikipedia's paid editors are a busy lot. -The Gnome (talk) 17:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is so heavily puffed up that it's hard to find anything of significance among all the long-winded descriptions of non-notable activity. But I don't see any evidence of passing WP:PROF or other notability criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.