Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaled Abou Bakr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Khaled Abou Bakr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Vanity article.reddogsix (talk) 05:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete besides the fact the article engages in a lot of unneeded promotional language, the article is one of the worst cases I have seen of being written like a CV. It even has the drawback of being written in bullet point instead of prose style. While this could be fixed, the problem shows the general issue of being not an encyclopedia article at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.