Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khabzela

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Khabzela

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure that these 2 sources that I found are enough to establish notability for this book: Foreign Policy, Independent Online. Bbarmadillo (talk) 09:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 09:58, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:43, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Obviously the current article is meagre, but in addition the mentioned reviews there is enough coverage in academic sources to satisfy WP:NBOOK:

Zulu, N.S. "Challenging Aids Denialism—Khabzela: Life and times of a South African." Journal of Literary Studies 25.1 (2009): 53-63.
Marks, Shula. "Science, Social Science and Pseudo-Science in the HIV/AIDS Debate in Southern Africa." Journal of Southern African Studies 33.4 (2007): 861-74.
Vambe, Maurice Taonezvi, and Chennells, Anthony. "Introduction: The Power of Autobiography in Southern Africa." Journal of Literary Studies 25.1 (2009): 1-7.
... and more ... Alexbrn (talk) 12:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Following from the above, I have significantly expanded the article with these (and other) sources. Alexbrn (talk) 17:22, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think at this stage the article meets the requirements of an encyclopedia and the five pillars of Wikipedia. Thanks to Alexbrn for working on it while I was offline Bobbyshabangu _talk 21:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satisfies WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. --Muhandes (talk) 12:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.