Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kezia Noble
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 21:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kezia Noble[edit]
- Kezia Noble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Seduction community" coach - doesn't seem notable per WP:BIO, article is written like an advertisement. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: "Seduction community?" I was almost ready to write this off as a joke, but the links do seem authentic. Nonetheless, this doesn't come close to meeting WP:BIO, let alone the GNG. Ravenswing 18:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- these also need to be looked at
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_La_Ruina
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Lyons
- these are also seduction community, if kezia page is deleted, then these pages should also be delete —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.129.201 (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion is about Kezia Noble. If other articles about people in this "seduction community" need to be deleted (as I'm sure many do) then they can be considered in separate discussions. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.