Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Ward (audio engineer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy re-nomination. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 22:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Ward (audio engineer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be non-notable music producer lacking non-trivial support. Most of the awards listed in the article he was not nominated for the awards, but rather the group he worked with was. The references are a lot of lists and blogs, but the article lacks in-depth coverage. He did win a couple of engineering awards, but not sure if they are sufficient to support notability. reddogsix (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE: Please see the hundreds of works for which Ward is credited for before considering him 'non-notable'. As for the awards/nominations being found in lists, these references are from the official awarding body of that particular award - surely there is no better source than the awarders? As for the depth of the coverage this is a recently started page, which will no doubt be improved over time and already contains far more information than many existing pages about living persons. USER:Hipica 18:49, 9 August 2014 (ECT)

Delete: article fails WP:GNG. No Reliable Sources validate its notabilityWikicology (talk) 16:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-He seems notable enough to me. Wgolf (talk) 02:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - It would really help if you would justify your comments. reddogsix (talk) 18:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (gimme a message) @ 20:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.