Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Short (Christian Brother)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Short (Christian Brother)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The only sources cited for information on the person are a court document and an article in a college newspaper. I'm glad that he was caught and punished for his crimes (assuming that is true) but that is the job of the police and courts, not WP. Kitfoxxe (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The current sources are very poor, with only one - the student newspaper - actually mentioning him in any context. (The court documents have the subject's name in two titles, but nothing more is available, and they wouldn't be reliable sources for the allegations in the article). At best, I don't think he's sufficiently notable. - Bilby (talk) 07:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I say weak keep as I want to give the opportunity for the creator to do improvements. As it seems to be more of a problem concerning the quality of the article rather than notability or not.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I still think that WP should not have articles on people whose only notability is being convicted criminals.Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per reasons given. Η936631 (talk) 07:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.