Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Moody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Moody[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t think the subject of this article is notable. Mccapra (talk) 05:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing in terms of RS from any source. The links in the article are junk (blocked or now gone). The few WP articles quoted in the article that are not red-links make no mention of Kevin Moody. Is this a hoax? Article was created by an editor who made just two edits in 2011 and was never heard of again. Britishfinance (talk) 21:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a hoax, she really does exist – here she is mentioned in the Nicholas Schou book [1]. Whether she is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article is another matter. Richard3120 (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard3120: Great find, and good to see. Don't think such a mention in a book however supports a BLP. thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She may not be a hoax but there is nothing to show she meets any notability standard.Sandals1 (talk) 18:02, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.