Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keven Veilleux (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keven Veilleux[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 04:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing has changed since the previous two deletions. Still non-notable. -DJSasso (talk) 13:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He is still a non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - One thing that has changed since the last deletion is that he now meets the old criteria of 100 games in AHL-level leagues (95 AHL + 5 Slovakia). But another thing that has changed is that criterion has increased to 200 games. Rlendog (talk) 01:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.