Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kev Adams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I brought the references over from the French article, so this AfD is now pointless. Non-admin closure. Safiel (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kev Adams[edit]

Kev Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced BLP. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • References can be found on the original article on the French Wikipedia.--Auric talk 02:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Which unfortunately, does us no good at all. If somebody who has duel proficiency in English and French wants to bring those references over, that would be good. Unfortunately, that person is not me. Safiel (talk) 02:34, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note Lousy references but there is a prima facie case for notability in the article. If the details of his career are in any way verifiable I'd say he meets WP:N. This just needs some good sources. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:38, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete The current references are not reliable, so delete as an unreferenced blp. That would change to keep if reliably sourced references are added. Safiel (talk) 02:34, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further comment Since the only issue is blp references, I suggest closing this AfD and placing a blp prod instead. Safiel (talk) 02:41, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep This is just lazy. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.