Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerala Gazetted Officers' Federation (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 00:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala Gazetted Officers' Federation

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails criteria laid down at WP:ORGCRITE. Lacks in-depth coverage, WP:CORPDEPTH. Run-of-the-mill routine news by WP:NEWSORGINDIA are inadequate. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep part of a copy-paste mass nomination of Kerala trade unions with no apparatent WP:BEFORE; does not address sourcing already provided last time this article was nominated. A vague wave citing WP:NEWSORGINDIA cannot stand for a nomination lacking specific analysis of problematic sourcing. Simple English searching shows multiyear coverage in The Hindu: 2024, 2023, 2015. Searching in Malayali reveals frequent, multiyear coverage in the press (see previous discussion for 14 sources). Not to mention, long-standing Kerala trade union, completely reasonable to assume off-line press sourcing in existence. WP:NEXIST, passes the WP:GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 05:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 15:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Goldsztajn, who summarized well the issue. There is no novel argument as to why the first AfD had come to any wrong outcome. --Soman (talk) 22:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.