Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-533

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of stars in Cygnus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler-533

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO, no significant coverage outside of comprehensive databases like the such as the Open Exoplanet Catalogue. One of many non-notable exoplanet articles created by Jtadesse (talk · contribs). Article deprodded by creator without improvement, who did not understand why comprhensive databases do not count toward notability per WP:ROUTINE. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Simply having an exoplanet is not enough for notability. Tercer (talk) 09:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of stars in Cygnus.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it fails WP:NASTRO. I found a mention of it in a Portuguese news article ([1]), but I doubt there's much significant coverage outside of this. As for the citations in this article, exoplanetkyoto.org looks like it's just a list of exoplanets (mentions in databases don't count, per WP:NASTRO), and I'm reasonably sure that gravitysimulator.org isn't a very reliable source. HoneycrispApples (talk) 02:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect per Kepler-1229b. The "Kepler-533b" redirect should be changed to List of exoplanets discovered in 2016, where it is listed. Praemonitus (talk) 02:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect to List of exoplanets discovered in 2016 or List of stars in Cygnus, both lists are applicable for Kepler-533. Certainly not a standalone article. SunDawn (talk) 09:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, since it is just another exoplanet. Cinadon36 06:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.