Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-1972

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Potential to recreate when there is more published research. RL0919 (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler-1972[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO. Single source, a preprint and apparently not yet even accepted for publication. Even accepting the source, this is not a notable object and fails on the WP:NASTCRIT criteria. At best, it is too soon. Lithopsian (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of exoplanets discovered in 2022 for now. I could find no evidence of notability. Praemonitus (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- We still can wait until NASA reveals a system, is it a option can you at least remove this page, unless it proved they exist by Publishers, i only found one: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11459 - TriNguyen12348 10:56 January, 30th, 2022 — Preceding undated comment added 15:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Also last sentence of article makes no sense. Nwhyte (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. (Unless NASA will published its system soon), Welp... i should edit in my sandbox because we can't search everywhere but I know, i found another minimal evidence: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/TTVs-for-Kepler-1972-b-top-and-Kepler-1972-c-bottom-The-black-errorbars-represent_fig2_358164104. Sciences searched its system, i'm sure NASA verifies a report about Kepler-1972 - TriNguyen12348 10:04, 30, January 2022 (GMT-8)

I'm not convinced that full publication of the discovery paper or addition to the standard databases would be enough to make this notable, but you can certainly take a copy to your sandbox, or to draft. Lithopsian (talk) 14:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know, i promise i will edit in the sandbox therefore i accidentally made a page as the normal page, one more thing, i noticed that NASA waits for a queue report about Kepler-1972 - TriNguyen12348 - 6:35 - Febuary 1st, 2022. (GMT-8) — Preceding undated comment added 11:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And hey! I already copy the entire page to my sandbox, should you delete that page (Kepler-1972)? - TriNguyen12348 10:04 (11:43 in UTC) - 1, Febuary 2022 (GMT-8)

Delete or redirect to 'Exoplanets discovered in 2022' upon publication. This is not 'published in Cornell University', this is a preprint hosted on the arxiv. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.