Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-1632b

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of exoplanets discovered in 2016. Cabayi (talk) 07:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler-1632b[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO, no significant coverage outside of comprehensive databases like the such as the Open Exoplanet Catalogue. One of many non-notable exoplanet articles created by Jtadesse (talk · contribs). Article deprodded by creator without improvement, who did not understand why comprhensive databases do not count toward notability per WP:ROUTINE. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability. Tercer (talk) 09:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be deleted. If the planet is potentially habitable, then why would it be unnotable. Check reliable results for "Kepler 1632b" on Bing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtadesse (talk • contribs) 18:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's a bit wild that we live in such times that we can say "eh, it's just another exoplanet", but ... eh, it's just another exoplanet. Catalogue/database entries don't amount to notability in the Wikipedian sense of the term. XOR'easter (talk) 22:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The planet has a possible exomoon, so it's difficult for me to decide.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, wrong planet.🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of exoplanets discovered in 2016 because it lacks notability. Praemonitus (talk) 14:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.