Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenwrick Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kenwrick Taylor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG, unreferenced (there is an external link to the A Very Handy Man publisher but not WP:RS) since creation in May 2009, not necessarily an issue but doing gsearches ("Kenwrick Taylor", "Kenwrick Taylor Dumb Jungle", "Kenwrick Taylor A Very Handy Man") brings up nothing useable, unable to confirm if Dumb Jungle on the Vogels shortlist but curious that WorldCat has not listed it at all, A Very Handy Man is in 12 libraries, way below "well known" threshold. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC) Coolabahapple (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find much of anything. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ran a proquest news archive search on his name, guessing he lives in Townsville because the only hit I got was in the Townsville Bulletin which runs a charming feature where each local bookstore is invited to name that week's "Top Reads" and the Progress Book Shop listed one of Taylor's novels. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BASIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NAUTHOR, WP:BASIC and no WP:RS. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.