Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kentucky Fried Cruelty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 16:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kentucky Fried Cruelty

The article is violates Wikipedia's neutrality policy, and has no reputable sources -- Teancum (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clean up and add references from reliable sources, which can be found at this Google News search and this Google News archive search. Ignore the press releases, though. -- Eastmain (talk) 18:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to the reliable sources, but this article needs a lot of work - it's extremely biased in favor of PETA. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 19:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge- A sub-section here. --The Firewall 20:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I totally agree with Bart133's point about bias. The page should be improved, and stay. --Lockley (talk) 23:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-This article makes PETA look like angels, and since there is no sources to give KFC a response, the article is unbalanced. --Thewritingwriter17 (talk) 16:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but trim down. The killing them at two months old was particularly funny (industrial farm chicken never live as long). NVO (talk) 19:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The cites are a joke: four are listed but they only link to two distinct pages. Neutrality is entirely absent; the whole article reads like a propaganda flyer handed out by PETA. Weasel words and total POV throughout, not a shred of Kentucky Fried Chicken's side of the story is presented. At best the subject of this article should be a footnote on the Kentucky Fried Chicken page. --Captain Infinity (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into PETA as the article is too biased to survive (and it has too much undue weight). The resulting redirect will be OK as WP:NPOV doesn't apply to redirects. A mention in Kentucky Fried Chicken should be brief, no more than a few lines. B.Wind (talk) 05:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.