Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenta Nagata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kenta Nagata[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does fulfill neither of the criteria of WP:COMPOSER. Only one single source, but not concerned with the subject itself. Article unsourced. No way to expand the article beyond a simple credits list. Prime Blue (talk) 14:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Prime Blue (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. —Prime Blue (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. —Prime Blue (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:COMPOSER and WP:NMUSIC. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Could not find any reliable sources or any otherwise significant coverage. –MuZemike 22:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient reliable coverage to verify notability. --DAJF (talk) 08:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.