Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenny Easterday
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Bearcat (talk) 01:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kenny Easterday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I'll say the same reason I proposed this article's deletion in the first place: Is he really notable enough? He has a disability and is on the Springer show - hardly good qualifacations, in my opinion. Plasma Twa 2 (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep seems to be rs coverage that might eke out a pass of WP:BIO Travellingcari (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep hard to quantify exactly why, but this article passes my sniff test, The subject has a movie that was loosley written about him, he playes a fictionalized version of himself in that movie, he regularly appears on television. IMDB says his starmeter has recently gone up 35%... He has been rated in the bottom 3% of notable actors of all time... but that's at least on the list.[1] 13,800 ghits. I dunno. I say keep. JERRY talk contribs 04:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know for sure, but I don't think IMDb is a reliable source on Wikipedia. That movie doesn't even have a article about it on Wikipedia, and even this article doesn't seem to be sure on whether or not it is a cult movie. Hardly notable. All he does on Springer is, really, walk up while people are talking (Which I have never understood why he does it). The security guards are more notable then he is, I think, and they don't have an article on them. I woudln't really call him an actor, either. Quite frankly, he is just a man with a disability who got a few breaks because of it. --Plasma Twa 2 (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.