Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Bryan Grammer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily Deleted per A7 by DGG @ 01:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC). After Midnight 0001 14:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kenneth Bryan Grammer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unknown candidate for US president, only source is an article in his hometown newspaper. Fails WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Small-town presidential 'hopeful' destined to be an 'also ran'. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. Not only fails WP:BIO but WP:POLITICIAN as well.-JayJasper (talk) 04:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article can be recreated if he gets on the ballot anywhere. Until then, he's not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete A7. No indication of importance.--William S. Saturn (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete No indication of importance via searches. Bgwhite (talk) 08:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Article shows no notability whatsoever- The Danville Register? Really? SOXROX (talk) 11:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As of right now, not notable. Article does not prove subject's notability adequately. —Diiscool (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Close, because this article has been speedily deleted. Difluoroethene (talk) 03:41, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.