Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenilworth Trail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kenilworth Trail[edit]

Kenilworth Trail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination for User:209.162.18.52, whose rationale (see the talk page of this AfD) was "i am nominating this for deletion. by itself it is not notable and over the coming months will simply become a proxy article for discussion about SW LRT extension in Minneapolis". I am neutral. Ansh666 20:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Ansh666 20:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. We don't delete articles because they might become problematic. There appears that there's just enough available sourcing to squeak this passt GNG, and therefore, it should be kept. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:26, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.