Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 13:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kendy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. His appearances with Chapecoense have so far been only in the Campeonato Catarinense, which is not a fully-professional league. JTtheOG (talk) 20:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per evidence below that he meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 13:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - may not have played in an FPL-listed league, but has played in Campeonato Catarinense and Brazilian Primeira Liga matches which included two clubs from FPL-listed leagues. Avai v. Chapecoense, Serie B vs. A club. Also, Cruzeiro v. Chapecoense, both Serie A clubs. R96Skinner (talk) 14:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets NFOOTY by playing in a competitive match between two teams from fully professional leagues. Even if it wasn't a league match, that's still sufficient. Smartyllama (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NFOOTY not the subject is only 20 years and is currently playing his just made his debut.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes NFOOTY, has played senior international football, in a fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Fenix down (talk) 13:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: GiantSnowman and nom said fail WP:NFOOTY while @Smartyllama, Pharaoh of the Wizards, and Fenix down: says pass WP:NFOOTY, can you give some evidence?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 13:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - @Hhkohh: the sources are noted both in the AfD above and in the article itself (the Soccerway reference). Fenix down (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down: Thanks. Hhkohh (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down and Hhkohh: - unsure why this has been relished when there is clear consensus he is notable? Giant Snowman 13:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just leave you to change your mind. Hhkohh (talk) 13:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.