Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendell McFayden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. Giant Snowman 09:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kendell McFayden[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet gng or nsoccer John from Idegon (talk) 06:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:NFOOTY as he's played in the USL Pro for Rochester Rhinos, which is a fully-professional league. Number 5 7 09:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NFOOTY - has played for two fully professional teams: the Rhinos and Austin Aztex when they were in the USSF Division 2 Professional League, and there are sufficient reliable sources to document the article. --Trödel 12:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Having played for Rochester, he clearly passes WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - with 26 appearances for the Rochester Rhinos that play in the the 3rd tier of professional soccer in the USA, in a league listed at WP:FPL this should not have been nominated for deletion. Particularly as the nomination basis that it doesn't meet WP:NSOCCER is not true. Perhaps User:John from Idegon can withdraw it. Nfitz (talk) 22:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw - very confusing notability guideline. Perhaps a soccer expert could add a clear list of what leagues qualify one for notability? John from Idegon (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.