Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelley Abbey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article has significantly improved during the course of the AfD and there is now a clear consensus to keep. Mkativerata (talk) 02:16, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kelley Abbey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete No evidence of notability. Still no third party sources after being tagged for five months. PROD was contested with an edit summary saying "Google does reveal sources indicating notability". However, the editor did not say what these sources were, and my Google searches have failed to confirm the statement. All the sources I found suffered from one or more of (1) not independent sources (e.g. www.kelleyabbey.com) (2) not reliable sources (e.g www.flixster.com, people.famouswhy.com, www.facebook.com) (3) only very briefly mentions Kelley Abbey (e.g. www.tv.com). JamesBWatson (talk) 09:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has a profile at IMDb so there is no reason to take her article down. –BuickCenturyDriver 12:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this a guideline or policy statement? Ryan Norton 12:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The presence of an IMDB page is a poor metric by which to gauge notability, but I wonder if the Green Room Awards and Mo Awards satisfy WP:ANYBIO. If these can be properly sourced, I might consider a keep here. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 13:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. A notable dancer, actress, choreographer and director with international recognition. Winner of multiple prestigious awards. Clearly satisfies WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER. WWGB (talk) 07:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per sourcing by WWGB. Well done! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 23:30, 7 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Satisfies WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENT now. Ryan Norton 00:20, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep per excellent WP:AFTER and improvements by User:WWGB. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:10, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Satisfies WP:CREATIVE with awards; good coverage in sources as well. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 03:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.