Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keller Regional Gifted Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After 3 relists, a consensus has not been established. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 04:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keller Regional Gifted Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible failing of WP:GNG and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Delete as proposer. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 21:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Elementary schools, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, are notable only if they have been reported on (preferably extensively) by journalists. Google news pops up only MENTIONS of the school, such as to explain where something happened, or to state that a certain person attended this school. Nothing that brings notability to the school itself. Fieari (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Thank you Appable, for finding the sources I could not. With those, I am more than happy to change my opinion to keep. Fieari (talk) 06:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - re notability concerns, I found this, this, and this. Obviously, you can't fail an essay like WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. If consensus is to delete, I'd recommend a merge with Chicago Public Schools instead, based on the essay quoted above. --Appable (talk) 23:29, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 17:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:41, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is an elementary school, we delete articles on elementary schools except when we have secondary sources, which we lack here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you saw the above sources I posted, since your !vote implies that there are no secondary sources whatsoever.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.