Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keki dadiseth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete the copyvio version and consider the non-copyvio temp version in its own right. (aeropagitica) (talk) 19:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keki dadiseth[edit]

Sounds like a self-promotional autobiography rather than an encyclopedia entry Netsnipe 18:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: It's a copyvio -- Netsnipe 20:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: See Keki dadiseth/Temp for a replacement article that is not a copyvio. TruthbringerToronto 22:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Senior executive in a major corporation. More notable in the wider world than a lot of the authors, artists and musicians who have entries here. Tevildo 18:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sounds important. The article is a bit better now. TruthbringerToronto 19:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: See Keki dadiseth/Temp for a replacement article that is not a copyvio. TruthbringerToronto 22:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The person is very notable in Corporate India. He definitely deserves an article. I am not sure how we deal with copy vio articles though. Can I just change this one or does it need to be deleted and a fresh one rewritten? In that case, I will make changes to the temp version mentioned by TruthbringerToronto -- Lost 02:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Wikipedia isn't a site for résumés though, and if Mr. Dadiseth isn't notable enough to be known outside the Indian corporate world, I don't really see the point of keeping the rather short temporary article either. When Mr. Dadiseth becomes more notable by Wikipedia standards, someone will write a better article; hopefully one not influenced by a copyvio to begin with. -- Netsnipe 05:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Without giving my opinion on the merit of inclusion of this article, I feel that if a person is considered notable at national level in any country (howsoever small or large it may be), there is no reason why the biography can't be added in Wikipedia. We shouldn't introduce any systematic bias in Wikipedia. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further comment - I wonder how a person covered by Businessweek is not notable by wikipedia standards [1], [2], [3]. The Indian arm of Unilever became the no. 1 FMCG company of India under his chairmanship -- Lost 06:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toss it over to the copyvio department and Strong Keep for the article at temp. However, the article should be moved to the right capitalization. --Gurubrahma 06:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.