Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keke Wyatt controversy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keke Wyatt controversy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-NPOV content fork of Keke Wyatt. This information had been on the main Wyatt article for several years, before the editor who created this article (Bab-a-lot (talk · contribs)) started editing it. I'm going to AGF on the creator's part, but even if this information were merged back into the main article, it gives undue weight to controversies that seem to have had no mainstream impact according to the references cited. Additionally the title is not a plausible search term if merged. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Surely a WP:CONTENTFORK. Some of the text from this article can be merged into Keke Wyatt and the rest discarded as repetitive. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a court of law, or a court of public opinion. No need to produce evidence so that a controversy can be decided. Give 2-3 sentences in her article about the issue.Northwestgnome (talk) 05:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.