Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keizoku

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 00:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keizoku[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television show - I couldn't find independent reliable sources. Doesn't meet WP:Notability (film). Prod tag was removed without comment by a new editor whose only edits have been to remove several prod tags without improving articles. Dana boomer (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this seems to meet the criteria for films, e.g. review by Mark Schilling in Japan Times. I expect this film was reviewed in multiple Japanese language magazines and newspapers which will be hard to track down just using online searches. JoshuSasori (talk) 23:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This original drama was one of the hits of 1999, successful enough that they not only made a movie, but also a sequel (Keizoku 2: Spec), which then had a movie made of it. Here are just some of many RS on the net about the various elements in the series: [1], [2], [3], etc. Miki Nakatani even won an award based on her acting in the series: [4]. Michitaro (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have no idea why this was relisted, since a show with two movies, a sequel, awards, and reliable coverage is sure to be notable. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.