Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith barker-main
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-07 11:24Z
Keith barker-main[edit]
- Keith barker-main (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Autobiography. No great asserion of notability. -- RHaworth 01:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Couldn't find any information written about him, so his article doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or be attributable. --Wafulz 02:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete His book ranks 323,935 in sales on amazon.uk (Barker-Main is British, so this is the appropriate site). Since it was only released in October 2006, that's pretty damning.--Djrobgordon 02:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and reasons. Sr13 (T|C) 05:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy and delete. Tagged with the {{userfy}} template. Could just be an honest goof. --Dennisthe2 19:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not notable. --Meno25 00:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's not clear from the article that he's notable. it's clear from the history that he wrote the article himself, which you are not allowed to do. If someone else independent writes a properly refed article about him that will be different NBeale 23:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.