Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Saltojanes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Saltojanes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was tempted to A7/G3 this as it's clearly largely fabricated. I can't find coverage of Saltojanes and I can't find any verification he has held a guiness record. Fails GNG and possibly V. The only piece I can find about this supposed record is from Forbes, which we've learned is 50/50 chance of being usable depending what it is and in this case, appears to just be a freelancer writing about it. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although this person exists, he has not been the subject of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Most of the assertions in the article cannot be verified, and the current referencing is unacceptable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough sourcing to substantiate claims, and merely being a Guinness World Record holder does not confer notability. Fails GNG. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 23:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The claims of notability here are referenced to primary sources, not reliable ones — and (purportedly) holding a Guinness world record is not an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts a person from still having to clear WP:GNG on proper reliable sources (especially since as near as I can tell, he was one participant in a troupe which achieved the record collectively, not a solo performer who got singled out for the distinction as an individual.) Bearcat (talk) 14:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.