Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Kuder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 13:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Kuder

I'm a little on the fence about this one. Although it's a well-written article, the only information I can really find on this guy is from his Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn pages. Every other Google hit I found only mention his name in passing. It also appears to be an autobiography, given that the creator's username is Kkuder. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He lost an election running against a political party's county secretarial position. That does not come close to meeting any of the notability guidelines. The entire article is written as a promotional piece (probably by the subject as noted by Metrosexual) and does nothing to demonstrate notability. In addition, no evidence at all that he meets the general notability guidelines. The Seeker 4 Talk 18:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – With only one hit, at this time ,on Google News, my choice for establishing notability, as shown here [1] have to say delete. However, I do hope to read about Mr. Kuder here at Wikipedia at a date in the not too distant future, once he becomes more established in the Republican Party. Thanks - ShoesssS ^Talk 19:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article being well-written has no bearing on notability. This is pretty much a candidate for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7, but now it's been brought here we might as well go through with the process to delete it by consensus. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unelected politician without coverage to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.