Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Jeffery (musician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keith Jeffery (musician)[edit]
- Keith Jeffery (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO. I appreciate he's a member of a notable band, but that isn't our inclusion standard. Ironholds (talk) 16:42, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not individually notable and not worth keeping as a redirect with this title. Since people may be searching for the band I would suggest moving Keith Jeffery (historian) over the Keith Jeffery disambiguation page, since there would only be one 'Keith Jeffery' article, and adding a hatnote on the former article pointing to the band. --Michig (talk) 19:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. I agree with Michig; a hatnote would seem applicable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above; this person has not established notability independent from the notable band of which he is a member. Gong show 18:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:MUSICBIO. it's quite laughable that the one source cited confirms he is a vegetarian. adds nothing to notability. LibStar (talk) 00:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Michig: not yet notable in his own right.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.