Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keenyah Hill (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to ANTM 4. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Keenyah Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Second runner-up on one season of America's Next Top Model, probably counts as WP:ONEEVENT. Previous attempts to redirect to the parent ANTM article were reverted. Would support returning to a redirect until the subject has significant accomplishments beyond appearing on the show. Note that she does have some hits in Google news, but none of those hits are for anything other than appearing on ANTM, as far as I can tell, so nothing outside the context of the show. Prior AFD closed as delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to ANTM 4. I found no significant coverage outside the contest and redirects are cheap. TheTito Discuss 23:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - The article itself makes no assertion of notability aside from ANTM. There is no indication in the article that she has gone on to major notable modeling work, or has otherwise done anything noteworthy. A search for sourcing uncovers no coverage about her aside from that related to the TV show. -- Whpq (talk) 16:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per above. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 22:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.